Home & kitchen case study: plan for ₹30L to ₹27L monthly revenue in 15–30 days
01 · Plan
Week by week
Weekly plan
| Week | Phase | Planned ad spend | Projected revenue | Projected ROAS | Projected purchases | Projected cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At enquiry, self-reported | – | – | ₹30L | – | – | – |
| Week 1 | Learning | ₹1,46,810 | ₹6,88,118 | 4.69x | 309 | ₹475 |
| Week 2 | Learning | ₹1,37,885 | ₹6,51,413 | 4.72x | 303 | ₹455 |
| Week 3 | Learning | ₹1,44,265 | ₹6,69,354 | 4.64x | 305 | ₹473 |
| Week 4 | Learning | ₹1,53,970 | ₹6,93,106 | 4.50x | 333 | ₹462 |
| Total | ₹5,82,930 | ₹27,01,991 | 4.64x | 1,250 | ₹466 |
02 · Funnel
Projected funnel, first view to purchase · the last 4 weeks
- Impressions52,22,599
- Link clicks80,8581.55% of impressions
- Landing-page views54,93667.94% of link clicks1.052% of impressions
- Added to cart6,99412.73% of landing-page views0.134% of impressions
- Checkout started3,49950.03% of added to cart0.067% of impressions
- Purchases1,25035.72% of checkout started0.024% of impressions
0.024% of impressions became purchases
03 · Mix
Where the planned budget goes · the last 4 weeks
| Segment | Planned ad spend | Share of spend | Projected purchases | Projected ROAS | Projected cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ₹3,78,335 | 64.9% | 808 | 4.62x | ₹468 | |
| ₹1,97,091 | 33.8% | 426 | 4.66x | ₹463 | |
| Audience Network | ₹7,504 | 1.3% | 16 | 4.72x | ₹469 |
| Segment | Planned ad spend | Share of spend | Projected purchases | Projected ROAS | Projected cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instagram Reels | ₹1,85,608 | 31.8% | 398 | 4.63x | ₹466 |
| Instagram Feed | ₹1,29,369 | 22.2% | 284 | 4.75x | ₹456 |
| Facebook Feed | ₹1,04,623 | 17.9% | 220 | 4.54x | ₹476 |
| Facebook Reels | ₹83,785 | 14.4% | 187 | 4.81x | ₹448 |
| Instagram Stories | ₹63,358 | 10.9% | 126 | 4.31x | ₹503 |
| Facebook Stories | ₹8,683 | 1.5% | 19 | 4.72x | ₹457 |
| Audience Network | ₹7,504 | 1.3% | 16 | 4.72x | ₹469 |
| Segment | Planned ad spend | Share of spend | Projected purchases | Projected ROAS | Projected cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospecting (cold audiences) | ₹5,05,010 | 86.6% | 1,079 | 4.62x | ₹468 |
| Retargeting (warm audiences) | ₹54,011 | 9.3% | 120 | 4.81x | ₹450 |
| Lookalike audiences | ₹12,109 | 2.1% | 25 | 4.50x | ₹484 |
| Advantage+ shopping | ₹11,800 | 2.0% | 26 | 4.64x | ₹454 |
04 · Creatives
Planned creative mix · the last 4 weeks
New ads per month
| Creative type | Tier | Planned ad spend | Projected purchases | Projected ROAS | Projected cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalogue (dynamic product ads) | Moderate | ₹76,048 | 171 | 4.87x | ₹445 |
| Static image | Moderate | ₹64,249 | 144 | 4.85x | ₹446 |
| Video | Moderate | ₹4,01,224 | 854 | 4.60x | ₹470 |
| UGC / creator video | Moderate | ₹22,420 | 46 | 4.43x | ₹487 |
| Carousel | Watchlist | ₹18,989 | 35 | 3.92x | ₹543 |
05 · How we'd help
How we'd help, why, and how it works
Research & offer · Week 1 to 2
What we'd do
The booking named scaling ad spend first, so the opening week on this established store goes there. Split the account into layers: one campaign to test creative, one to scale winners, prospecting that leaves out past buyers, and retargeting for carts. Open with three documents: a website audit, a creative brief and a media plan by month.
Why
An established home and kitchen store asked us how to grow monthly revenue in 15–30 days, from ₹30L to ₹60L (2x). That is faster than nine in ten of our measured accounts grew over the same time, so the plan below is modelled on what that fastest tenth reached and shows where it lands against the target. At booking, the brand named scaling ad spend as its main problem, with marketing and social presence close behind. Without layers, retargeting quietly eats the prospecting budget. Later budget calls need something written to be judged against.
How it works
Retargeting sits next to prospecting and never replaces it. All three are shared with the brand's team before any budget step.
Measurement & targets · Week 1 to 4
What we'd do
Report net sales after returns, cancellations and tax next to store revenue and platform revenue. Agree a written target for every week on the way from ₹30L to ₹60L, and start each review with the week-to-date figure against it.
Why
With no return on ad spend reported, the plan begins at the level measured stores of that size hold. In measured accounts net sales ran below logged store revenue, so targets sit on the lower number. A missed week shows up early instead of at the end of the plan.
How it works
Budget decisions are read off net sales, not the ad platform alone. Each budget step is argued against the written target.
Creative testing · Week 1 to 4
What we'd do
Lead the testing layer with video, catalogue ads and static image, building to a few dozen new ads a month by the last four weeks, keeping carousel on a short leash because its return trails the account. Separate the lead products into their own campaigns and review each one weekly. Stack kitchen and home interests around a creator video of the lead product. Keep creators producing UGC video on a steady schedule, and cut the winners into regional languages.
Why
Shared campaigns hide weak products; separate ones expose them fast. A demonstration video explains a utility product faster than a static image. Regular UGC keeps testing going, and a regional cut stretches a winning idea further.
How it works
Budget follows the products that sell. The interest stack runs beside a broad audience, read on the same video. Regional cuts of a winner come before new ideas. New ads rise with the budget, most of them video, then catalogue ads.
Scaling · Week 4
What we'd do
Through Week 4, push toward ₹60L: the budget stays close to the learning level while return holds, and Instagram Reels carries the most spend and Instagram Feed the next. Run cost caps, bid caps, CBO and ABO as parallel versions before budget steps up. Let return decide budget: more while it holds, less when it slips.
Why
In Week 4 the modelled budget stays close to the learning level, while return on spend holds. Each budget step here is sized so that return stays close to where it was. Parallel controls reveal which setup keeps cost per purchase down as spend grows.
How it works
Controls run as parallel versions and the one that holds cost is kept. There is no fixed ramp; each week's budget follows the return of the last. Most of the last four weeks's spend sits on Instagram Reels, then Instagram Feed. Prospecting to new buyers takes the bulk of spend, while retargeting returns more for each rupee.
06 · Milestones
Projected milestones by week
- Week 1
First, the set-up: a small daily budget carries the first ads, and store orders are matched to tracking. Net sales are reconciled against logged revenue. The website audit, creative brief and media plan are shared.
- Projected revenue ₹6.9L
- Projected ROAS 4.69x
- Planned ad spend ₹1.5L
- Week 2
First creative read: ads that do not convert are cut. Budget holds and return on spend holds.
- Projected revenue ₹6.5L
- Projected ROAS 4.72x
- Planned ad spend ₹1.4L
- Week 3
Store fixes and offers go live while orders confirm.
- Projected revenue ₹6.7L
- Projected ROAS 4.64x
- Planned ad spend ₹1.4L
- Week 4
By the end of learning, the buyer is known and one ad has won. Budget holds and return on spend holds. ₹60L is not reached in the time, because budget stops rising where return would slip. Each order costs about what it did while learning.
- Projected revenue ₹6.9L
- Projected ROAS 4.50x
- Planned ad spend ₹1.5L
07 · Learnings
Learnings from Home & kitchen brands we measured
Targeted kitchen and home-brand interest stacks around an influencer video
Ran regional-language versions of the winning creative (6.9x)
Tested cost caps and bid caps against open bidding
Services behind this plan: Performance marketing · Ads video creation · Book a call
More Home & kitchen case studies
Ready to grow with one team?
Book a call. If we can help you hit your goals, we will tell you how; if we cannot, we will tell you that too.
