Fashion & apparel case study: ₹25,000 to ₹35,638 monthly revenue in 6 months
Case study
Month by month
Revenue by month
| Month | Phase | Ad spend | Revenue | ROAS | Purchases | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | – | – | ₹25,000 | – | – | – |
| Month 1 | Learning | ₹13,376 | ₹25,699 | 1.92x | 13 | ₹1,029 |
| Month 2 | Scaling | ₹14,151 | ₹27,206 | 1.92x | 14 | ₹1,011 |
| Month 3 | Scaling | ₹16,954 | ₹32,535 | 1.92x | 17 | ₹997 |
| Month 4 | Scaling | ₹18,042 | ₹34,081 | 1.89x | 17 | ₹1,061 |
| Month 5 | Steady | ₹17,744 | ₹34,836 | 1.96x | 18 | ₹986 |
| Month 6 | Steady | ₹18,170 | ₹35,638 | 1.96x | 18 | ₹1,009 |
| Total | ₹98,437 | ₹1,89,995 | 1.93x | 97 | ₹1,015 |
Funnel
Funnel, first view to purchase month 6
- Impressions1,08,672
- Link clicks1,9291.78% of impressions
- Landing-page views1,34969.93% of link clicks1.241% of impressions
- Added to cart957.04% of landing-page views0.087% of impressions
- Checkout started5962.11% of added to cart0.054% of impressions
- Purchases1830.51% of checkout started0.017% of impressions
0.017% of impressions became purchases
Mix
Where the budget goes month 6
| Segment | Ad spend | Share of spend | Purchases | ROAS | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ₹11,948 | 65.8% | 12 | 2.02x | ₹996 | |
| ₹6,222 | 34.2% | 6 | 1.85x | ₹1,037 |
| Segment | Ad spend | Share of spend | Purchases | ROAS | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instagram Reels | ₹5,025 | 27.7% | 5 | 2.02x | ₹1,005 |
| Instagram Feed | ₹4,591 | 25.3% | 5 | 2.13x | ₹918 |
| Facebook Feed | ₹4,428 | 24.4% | 4 | 1.86x | ₹1,107 |
| Instagram Stories | ₹2,332 | 12.8% | 2 | 1.79x | ₹1,166 |
| Facebook Reels | ₹1,794 | 9.9% | 2 | 1.85x | ₹897 |
| Segment | Ad spend | Share of spend | Purchases | ROAS | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospecting (cold audiences) | ₹15,603 | 85.9% | 15 | 1.93x | ₹1,040 |
| Retargeting (warm audiences) | ₹1,591 | 8.8% | 2 | 2.18x | ₹796 |
| Advantage+ shopping | ₹976 | 5.4% | 1 | 2.10x | ₹976 |
Creatives
Creative mix month 6
New ads per month
| Creative type | Tier | Ad spend | Purchases | ROAS | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalogue (dynamic product ads) | Moderate | ₹4,580 | 5 | 2.01x | ₹916 |
| Video | Moderate | ₹10,623 | 10 | 1.95x | ₹1,062 |
| Static image | Moderate | ₹2,967 | 3 | 1.94x | ₹989 |
How we run it
How we run it, why, and how it works
Research & offer Month 1
What we do
We start with turning visits into orders, which the brand in this scenario named first, before anything else on this smaller store. We fix the store before scaling: trust pointers, reviews, a clear return window, an about page and a prepaid incentive. We put best-sellers on product pages and lead with the one or two categories that already sell.
Why
In this case study, a smaller fashion brand grows monthly revenue in 6 months, from ₹25,000 to ₹1L (4x). Nine in ten of the accounts we measured grew more slowly than that in the same time; the case study follows the fastest tenth's pace, holds budget where return starts to slip, and shows the gap to the brand's number honestly. The main problem was turning visits into orders, followed by marketing and social presence. Conversion rate caps what any ad budget can return. Lead categories give prospecting ads a proven entry point.
How it works
Fixes are listed and handed over early, so later budget lands on a store that converts. Lead categories carry the first scaling months.
Measurement & reviews Month 1 to 6
What we do
We write month-by-month revenue numbers with the brand's team that climb from ₹25,000 to ₹1L, and open every review with the month-to-date number against them. We keep a shared daily sheet with the ad platform's revenue next to real store orders. We set a written rule: no budget step in a month where return falls too far to pay for it.
Why
With no return on ad spend reported, the case study begins at the level measured fashion stores of that size hold. A missed month shows up early instead of at the end of the case study. The ad platform's own count runs high, so the store's count is the one that moves budget.
How it works
Each budget step is argued against the written number. Budget decisions are read off store numbers, not the ad platform alone. A month whose return slips past that point keeps its budget instead.
Creative testing Month 1
What we do
We lead the testing layer with video, catalogue ads and static image, building to about a dozen new ads a month by the final month, with no format far behind the account's return. We run every lead product in a campaign of its own, read every week. We run creator, customer-feedback and founder-led video. We brief creators for a steady run of UGC video, with regional-language cuts of the winners.
Why
Shared campaigns hide weak products; separate ones expose them fast. Trust-carrying video held return in most measured accounts. Regular UGC keeps testing going, and a regional cut stretches a winning idea further.
How it works
A product that does not sell is paused inside the week. Weak UGC is swapped for founder-led video rather than scaled. Winning UGC is cut into regional languages before new ideas are bought. New ads rise with the budget, most of them video, then catalogue ads.
Scaling Month 2 to 4
What we do
Through Month 2 to Month 4, we push as far toward ₹1L as return allows: the budget rises gently while return holds, and Instagram Reels carries the most spend and Instagram Feed the next. We recover abandoned checkouts with WhatsApp messages as traffic grows. We let return decide budget: more while it holds, less when it slips.
Why
Across Month 2 to Month 4, the budget rises gently, while return on spend holds. In one of these months the step is trimmed to the size return can hold. Return holds through these months because each budget step stops where return starts to slip. WhatsApp is cheaper than paid retargeting for buyers who already reached checkout.
How it works
WhatsApp recovery runs alongside paid retargeting, not instead of it. Budget follows return month to month instead of a fixed ramp. Instagram Reels carries the largest share of spend in the final month, with Instagram Feed next. Most spend reaches people who have not bought yet; past visitors return more per rupee.
Steady state Month 5 to 6
What we do
From Month 5, we hold the gains and push toward ₹1L only as far as return allows. We ask for a seasonal landing page, new ad formats and delivery banners ahead of the festive peak. We recover abandoned checkouts and lift repeat orders with WhatsApp messages.
Why
Growth slows from Month 5, still short of ₹1L. Budget stays about level over these months. Season-specific pages convert season traffic better than the default collection. A message to someone who nearly bought costs less than an ad.
How it works
The seasonal page is requested before the season, with the catalogue campaign. Messages run beside retargeting ads.
Milestones
Milestones by month
- Month 1
Learning month: the first ads run on a small daily budget while tracking is checked against store orders. Store orders and platform revenue are reconciled in the shared sheet. Lead categories get their own campaigns.
- Revenue ₹25,699
- ROAS 1.92x
- Ad spend ₹13,376
- Month 2
The scaling phase opens: abandoned checkouts get WhatsApp follow-ups. Return on spend holds while budget holds.
- Revenue ₹27,206
- ROAS 1.92x
- Ad spend ₹14,151
- Month 3
Repeat-order messages go to past buyers. Return on spend holds while budget steps up.
- Revenue ₹32,535
- ROAS 1.92x
- Ad spend ₹16,954
- Month 4
The winning UGC runs in regional-language versions. Budget goes up only as far as return can carry it: return on spend holds while budget holds.
- Revenue ₹34,081
- ROAS 1.89x
- Ad spend ₹18,042
- Month 5
The case study moves into its steady phase, leaning on refreshed ads and repeat buyers.
- Revenue ₹34,836
- ROAS 1.96x
- Ad spend ₹17,744
- Month 6
Budget is reviewed against return before the next step. Budget goes up only as far as return can carry it: return on spend holds while budget holds. The case study finishes short of ₹1L: budget stops rising where return starts to slip. Each order costs about what it did while learning.
- Revenue ₹35,638
- ROAS 1.96x
- Ad spend ₹18,170
Learnings
Learnings from Fashion & apparel brands we measured
Meta in four layers: creative testing, scaling, mid-funnel and catalogue retargeting
SEO alongside: product titles, collection copy, feed and technical audit
Read Meta against Shopify every week
Services: Performance marketing Ads video creation Fashion & apparel marketing guide Book a call
More Fashion & apparel case studies
Ready to grow with one team?
Book a call. If we can help you grow, we show you how; if we cannot, we tell you that too.
