Fashion & apparel case study: ₹6L to ₹11L monthly revenue in 3 months
Case study
Month by month
Revenue by month
| Month | Phase | Ad spend | Revenue | ROAS | Purchases | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | – | – | ₹6L | – | – | – |
| Month 1 | Learning | ₹1,04,774 | ₹6,00,294 | 5.73x | 222 | ₹472 |
| Month 2 | Scaling | ₹1,70,320 | ₹8,45,830 | 4.97x | 315 | ₹541 |
| Month 3 | Scaling | ₹2,66,895 | ₹11,04,503 | 4.14x | 418 | ₹639 |
| Total | ₹5,41,989 | ₹25,50,627 | 4.71x | 955 | ₹568 |
Funnel
Funnel, first view to purchase month 3
- Impressions25,59,520
- Link clicks38,8651.52% of impressions
- Landing-page views30,16477.61% of link clicks1.179% of impressions
- Added to cart3,52911.7% of landing-page views0.138% of impressions
- Checkout started1,40339.76% of added to cart0.055% of impressions
- Purchases41829.79% of checkout started0.016% of impressions
0.016% of impressions became purchases
Mix
Where the budget goes month 3
| Segment | Ad spend | Share of spend | Purchases | ROAS | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ₹1,77,521 | 66.5% | 285 | 4.23x | ₹623 | |
| ₹84,922 | 31.8% | 126 | 3.92x | ₹674 | |
| Audience Network | ₹4,452 | 1.7% | 7 | 4.37x | ₹636 |
| Segment | Ad spend | Share of spend | Purchases | ROAS | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instagram Feed | ₹74,787 | 28.0% | 126 | 4.46x | ₹594 |
| Instagram Reels | ₹68,625 | 25.7% | 110 | 4.22x | ₹624 |
| Facebook Feed | ₹53,025 | 19.9% | 78 | 3.89x | ₹680 |
| Instagram Stories | ₹34,109 | 12.8% | 49 | 3.75x | ₹696 |
| Facebook Reels | ₹24,682 | 9.2% | 36 | 3.87x | ₹686 |
| Audience Network | ₹4,452 | 1.7% | 7 | 4.37x | ₹636 |
| Facebook Stories | ₹3,758 | 1.4% | 6 | 4.37x | ₹626 |
| Facebook Video | ₹3,457 | 1.3% | 6 | 4.37x | ₹576 |
| Segment | Ad spend | Share of spend | Purchases | ROAS | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospecting (cold audiences) | ₹2,11,319 | 79.2% | 324 | 4.05x | ₹652 |
| Retargeting (warm audiences) | ₹27,767 | 10.4% | 48 | 4.57x | ₹578 |
| Lookalike audiences | ₹14,298 | 5.4% | 23 | 4.28x | ₹622 |
| Advantage+ shopping | ₹13,511 | 5.1% | 23 | 4.41x | ₹587 |
Creatives
Creative mix month 3
New ads per month
| Creative type | Tier | Ad spend | Purchases | ROAS | Cost per purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalogue (dynamic product ads) | Moderate | ₹58,022 | 94 | 4.28x | ₹617 |
| Video | Moderate | ₹1,37,474 | 216 | 4.15x | ₹636 |
| Static image | Moderate | ₹50,032 | 78 | 4.13x | ₹641 |
| UGC / creator video | Moderate | ₹15,523 | 22 | 3.79x | ₹706 |
| Carousel | Watchlist | ₹5,844 | 8 | 3.46x | ₹730 |
How we run it
How we run it, why, and how it works
Research & offer Month 1
What we do
The first problem in this scenario is growth that has stalled, so the opening month on this mid-sized store goes there. We split the account into layers: one campaign to test creative, one to scale winners, prospecting that leaves out past buyers, and retargeting for carts. We get the store ready for paid traffic first: reviews and trust pointers on product pages, a visible return window, an about page and a reason to pay upfront.
Why
A mid-sized fashion brand grows monthly revenue in 3 months, from ₹6L to ₹10L–₹15L (2.1x). That is faster than nine in ten of our measured accounts grew over the same time, so the case study below is on what that fastest tenth reached and shows where it lands against the number this scenario calls for. The main problem in this scenario is growth that has stalled, with scaling ad spend close behind. Without layers, retargeting quietly eats the prospecting budget. No budget returns more than the store converts.
How it works
Retargeting sits next to prospecting and never replaces it. Site fixes are handed over in the first weeks, before budget rises.
Measurement & reviews Month 1 to 3
What we do
We log store orders every day beside what the ad platform claims. We write month-by-month revenue numbers with the brand's team that climb from ₹6L to ₹10L–₹15L, and open every review with the month-to-date number against them. We reconcile the return on spend the brand in this scenario reports with store revenue before the first budget change.
Why
The return on ad spend it reported sits above what measured fashion stores of that size hold; the case study starts from it and allows for some of it to give way as spend rises. The ad platform's own count runs high, so the store's count is the one that moves budget. A missed month shows up early instead of at the end of the case study.
How it works
The sheet is read before each budget change. The month's number is on the page at every review. The reported return and the store-side return are read side by side every week.
Creative testing Month 1
What we do
We lead the testing layer with video, catalogue ads and static image, building to a few dozen new ads a month by the final month, with carousel watched closely since it returns less than the rest. We run every lead product in a campaign of its own, read every week. The learning month runs with a deliberately small daily budget until orders prove the buyer. We work in creative batches with a fixed read window each.
Why
A product nobody buys is visible within a week when it has its own campaign. The first rupees are for finding the buyer, not for volume. A fixed window stops spend chasing a creative before it has been read.
How it works
Losing products are paused within a week and budget moves to the winners. Only confirmed orders at the low budget unlock the next step. Only ads that convert inside the window keep running. New ads rise with the budget, most of them video, then catalogue ads.
Scaling Month 2 to 3
What we do
Through Month 2 to Month 3, we push as far toward ₹10L–₹15L as return allows: the budget climbs in steps and return falls, and Instagram Feed carries the most spend and Instagram Reels the next. We run cost caps, bid caps, CBO and ABO as parallel versions before budget steps up. We let return decide budget: more while it holds, less when it slips.
Why
In Month 2 to Month 3 the budget climbs in steps, and return on spend falls as it does. In measured accounts, scaling spend raised cost per order and lowered return on spend, so each step waits for return to hold. Parallel controls reveal which setup keeps cost per purchase down as spend grows.
How it works
Controls run as parallel versions and the one that holds cost is kept. Each month's budget is set by the return the last one earned. In the final month, Instagram Feed takes the most spend and Instagram Reels the next most. Most spend reaches people who have not bought yet; past visitors return more per rupee.
Milestones
Milestones by month
- Month 1
The learning phase opens: the first ads run on a small daily budget while tracking is checked against store orders. Reported and store-side returns are reconciled. The layered account is in place, with retargeting beside prospecting.
- Revenue ₹6L
- ROAS 5.73x
- Ad spend ₹1L
- Month 2
Scaling starts: bid-cap and cost-cap versions run beside open bidding. With budget steps up sharply, return on spend falls.
- Revenue ₹8.5L
- ROAS 4.97x
- Ad spend ₹1.7L
- Month 3
Budget is reviewed against return before the next step. With budget steps up sharply, return on spend falls. Halfway from ₹6L to ₹10L–₹15L is passed. The case study finishes short of ₹10L–₹15L: the case study follows what the fastest tenth of our measured accounts reached. Each order costs more by the end than it did while learning.
- Revenue ₹11L
- ROAS 4.14x
- Ad spend ₹2.7L
Learnings
Learnings from Fashion & apparel brands we measured
Tested each colour of the lead product in its own campaign
Meta in four layers: creative testing, scaling, mid-funnel and catalogue retargeting
Return on spend fell from its peak month in most engagements; peaks do not hold.
Services: Performance marketing Ads video creation Fashion & apparel marketing guide Book a call
More Fashion & apparel case studies
Ready to grow with one team?
Book a call. If we can help you grow, we show you how; if we cannot, we tell you that too.
